Free · Bring one real decision
When a decision matters, an answer isn't enough. Quorum helps you uncover the assumptions, trade-offs and unknowns behind the decision — then shows you what to resolve before you act.
Challenge the decision. Identify what could change the answer. Decide what to do next.
They're hard because too many things matter at once. Your goals conflict. The future is uncertain. Other people are affected. Some choices are reversible. Others aren't. And when the decision is personal, you're often too close to see the structure clearly.
More information doesn't always create more clarity. Sometimes it creates more noise.
Anonymised examples from people who used Quorum on consequential decisions.
Your decisions leave patterns. What risks do you consistently underestimate? Where do you seek too much certainty? When do you overvalue the upside? What do you repeatedly fail to consider? Quorum turns past decisions into context for the next one. Not a generic personality profile — your decision-making history.
01 — Contradiction Detector
Quorum tracks the principles behind your decisions — and flags it when a later one breaks them.
02 — Bias Fingerprint
Not a generic label — the exact moments in your own record where a pattern shows up, precise enough to catch next time.
03 — Decision Independence Score
A rising score means your own judgment is taking hold. A flat one is a signal too — you see both.
↗ +47 points across 12 sessions. Quorum's frameworks are showing up in your framing before the Council even runs.
04 — Confidence Calibration
Every session starts with one question: how confident are you? Months later, Quorum asks again — knowing what happened. Over time, it shows you where that confidence holds.
A single decision can show a useful read. Several decisions, connected, start to reveal how someone repeatedly approaches risk, uncertainty, and trade-offs. Here's what that looks like.
One founder's composite record, in order — illustrative, and structurally linked in ways nobody set out to design.
Read the full recordFounders, executives, investors, boards, institutions — composite briefs, browsable by category, growing as new sessions happen.
Browse the Decision LibraryCurious what changes when the recommendation gets challenged? Read the AI vs. Quorum experiment →
We gave Gemini and Quorum the same five consequential decisions. The surprising part wasn't that they disagreed. They often agreed. The difference emerged when we challenged the answer.
Five composite scenarios, founder-run — not customer data.
Read the experimentThe strongest proof is what happens when the decision is yours.
Bring the decision you're actually wrestling with.
Bring one real decisionWhere the outcome matters, and there's no obviously right answer.
A difficult decision isn't just a question with an answer. Quorum examines what you're actually deciding, then challenges the reasoning — before helping you decide what to do.
Free · Bring one real decision
The first answer isn't the finish line. It's the beginning of the examination.
Judgment Compounding is the process of improving future decisions by systematically learning from past decisions, reasoning, outcomes, and feedback. Unlike a single good decision, Judgment Compounding asks whether each consequential decision improves the quality of the next one.
Quorum Vault makes this process deliberate. It preserves what you knew, assumed, expected, and believed when a decision was made, then connects that record to what happened afterward.
Over time, this helps reveal where your judgment is reliable, where confidence and outcomes diverge, which patterns keep returning, and what should change before the next decision.
Sometimes Quorum says go. Sometimes it says wait. Sometimes it changes its mind.
The point is not to always be cautious. The point is to know why you're deciding.
Your first answer feels convincing? Good. Now challenge it.
Quorum lets you attack the recommendation, see which advisors change position, understand what changed, and identify what evidence would reverse the decision.
The core session is free. Elite adds Mirror, the decision record that enables Judgment Compounding. Private is your own infrastructure, for teams. Most people start by bringing one real decision to the free tier — that's the whole point.
No. Before any advisor responds, your decision is read at a structural level — what kind of decision this is, not just what you typed. A chatbot routes your text straight to a model; Quorum doesn't.
Judgment Compounding is the process of improving future decisions by systematically learning from past decisions, reasoning, outcomes, and feedback. Unlike a single good decision, Judgment Compounding asks whether each consequential decision improves the quality of the next one. Quorum Vault supports this by connecting your decision record, reasoning, confidence, and eventual outcomes over time.
Your raw inputs are encrypted at the field level. You can export or delete your full data on request at any time. Nothing about your decisions is used in a case study or shared externally without your explicit, opt-in consent.
If you choose to — export a private PDF brief for a board or co-founder, or share a link to just the verdict. Both are entirely optional; nothing is shared unless you decide to.
Founders, CXOs, and family office principals — people making decisions where being wrong is expensive. It isn't built for everyday, low-stakes choices.
The Council — the core six-advisor session — is free. Elite adds Mirror, which compounds insight across your decisions over time, for ₹2,999/mo or ₹29,999/yr. Private is a custom enterprise deployment, starting at ₹9,999/user/month — priced once we understand your organization's needs.
The Council is the six-advisor session you get on any single decision. Mirror is the layer underneath it that compounds across sessions — your bias fingerprint, calibration over time, recurring patterns, how you compare to your peers, a reliability score for every session you bring — and unlocks once you have enough decision history for it to be meaningful.
Yes. On Elite, you can paste a background note or upload a ChatGPT or Claude conversation export, and it's distilled into individual facts — goals, constraints, patterns — that you review and approve before anything is saved. The raw file itself is discarded once the insights are extracted; only what you approve feeds the Council.
Quorum uses different models for different plans, matched to what each plan is for. Free runs on GPT-5-mini end-to-end — strong reasoning at a cost that keeps the free tier sustainable for everyone. Elite pairs GPT-5-mini for fast reasoning with Claude Sonnet for Quorum's deepest analysis — Council Synthesis, Mirror, and long-term pattern-reading. Private runs entirely inside your own infrastructure, on either self-hosted Qwen or self-hosted Mistral, whichever you choose.
Because each plan optimizes for a different goal. Free is built to be accessible to everyone while staying sustainable. Elite is built for the highest-quality personal decision intelligence. Private is built for complete ownership and enterprise deployment. The model each plan runs on follows from that goal — it isn't the goal itself; Quorum's judgment quality is what you're actually buying.
Elite is a straightforward self-serve monthly or annual subscription — cancel whenever you like, no lock-in. Private is a custom enterprise arrangement, so changes or cancellation go through your account contact rather than a self-service button.
No. Quorum is a decision intelligence tool, not a licensed financial or legal advisor. The final call — and any financial or legal decision — is always yours; consult a qualified professional for those specifically.
You can export everything tied to your account or request full deletion at any time from account settings.
Your decision is first tagged structurally — the kind of decision it is, what it structurally resembles from your own history — and each of the six advisors responds from that read, not from a single generic model pass.
Yes, automatically. A challenge is treated as new information for the whole council, not a private exchange with one advisor — so it reaches all six. Each advisor still reassesses it independently through its own lens and may keep, strengthen, weaken, or reverse its position; sharing the information never means they share a conclusion. The Council synthesizes once, after every advisor has had a chance to weigh in.
Yes — it's a web app you can install to your home screen directly from your browser. No app-store download needed.
Don't give Quorum a hypothetical. Give it the decision you're actually wrestling with.
Not sure if your situation fits? Talk it through first →